Llicenciatura en Dret (3311)
Innovació i Canvi Tecnológic(10089)
Tema 1
Introducció. Per què els economistes estudien la ciència, la
tecnologia i la innovació?
Bibliografia
*RUTTAN, Vernon W. 2001
Technology, Growth and Development. Oxford University Press.
[Part I].
*FREEEMAN, Chris and Luc Soete. 1997.
The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition). The
MIT Press. [Ch.1].
ROSENBERG, Nathan and L. E. Birdzell. 1986.
How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the
Industrial World. New York, Basic Books. [Ch.1].
Tema 2
La perspectiva històrica. Què fa a una societat ser un innovador
d’èxit?
Bibliografia
* MOKYR, Joel. 1993.
La Palanca de la riqueza: creatividad tecnológica y progreso
económico. Alianza Editorial. [Cap. 1 i 7].
*MOKYR, Joel. 1990.
The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic
Progress. New York: Oxford University Press. [Parts II &
III].
FREEMAN, Chris and Luc Soete. 1997.
The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition). The
MIT Press. [Part One].
DIAMOND, Jared. 1998.
Guns, Germs and Steel. New York: Vintage, Random House.
[Part 2].
ROSENBERG, Nathan and L. E. Birdzell. 1986.
How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the
Industrial World. New York, Basic Books. [Cap.2-5, especialment
Cap. 4*].
Tema 3
La perspectiva macroeconòmica. La ciència i la tecnologia com a
factors de creixement. Les implicacions macroeconòmiques de la
difusió de les innovacions.
Bibliografia
*RUTTAN, Vernon W. 2001
Technology, Growth and Development. Oxford University Press.
[Part I].
*JONES, Charles. 2001.
Introduction to Economic Growth. 2
nd edition. Norton. [The Economics of Ideas].
FREEMAN, Chris and Luc Soete. 1997.
The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition). The
MIT Press. [Part Three].
GREENWOOD , Jeremy. 1997.
The Third Industrial Revolution: Technology, Productivity and
Income Inequality, AEI Studies on Understanding
Inequality, Washington, D.C. The AEI Press. [Also, printed in
the
Economic Review, 1999, Federal Reserve Bank
of Cleveland].
FAGERBERG, Jan. 1994. “Technology and
International Differences in Growth Rates”
Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1147–1175.
Tema 4
La perspectiva microeconòmica. Són els béns d’innovació
diferents?
Bibliografia
*ARROW, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the
Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in R.R. Nelson ed.
The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and
Social Facotrs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
RUTTAN, Vernon W. 2001
Technology, Growth and Development. Oxford University Press.
[Part II].
JONES, Charles. 2001.
Introduction to Economic Growth. 2
nd edition. Norton. [The Economics of Ideas].
ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1982.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press. [Ch. 3&5].
SHAPIRO, Carl and Hal R. Varian. 1999.
Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy.
Harvard Business School Press. [Ch. 1&2].
SHERER, F.M. 1999.
New Perspectives on Economic Growth and Technological
Innovation. Brookings.
Tema 5
La perspectiva del segle XXI. “La Nova Economia”, és
nova? [1r. debat].
Bibliografia
*GORDON, Robert. 2000. “Does the ‘New
Economy’ Measure up to Great innovations of the Past?”
Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14, 4, 49-74.
*BRANFORD DeLong, J. 2002. “Do We Have a
‘New’ Macroeconomy?” in A.B. Jaffe, J.
Lerner and S. Stern (eds.)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 2), 163
–184.
COHEN, Daniel, Pietro Garibaldi and Stefano Scarpetta. 2004.
The ICT Revolution: Productivity Differences and the Digital
Divide. Oxford University Press. [Part I].
TEMPLE, Jonathan. 2002. “The Assessment: The New
Economy,”
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18: 241-264.
Tema 6
El mercat i les perspectives regionals. El mercat com a mecanisme
de selecció. La regió com a font d’innovació.
Bibliografia
*ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1982.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press [Chs. 8&10].
*FLORIDA, Richard. 2003. “Entrepreneurship, Creativity
and Regional Economic Growth” in David M. Hart. Ed.
The Emergency of Entrepreneurship Policy.
BRESNAHAN, Timothy F. and Franco Malerba. 2002.
“The Value of Competitive Innovation and U.S: Policy towards
the Computer Industry” in Chong-En Bai and Chi-Wa Yuen (eds.)
Technology and the New Economy. The MIT Press.
SAH, R. and Joseph Stiglitz. 1986. “The Architecture of
Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies”,
American Economic Review 76(4), 716 –727.
Tema 7
La perspectiva de l’empresa i la indústria. L’evolució
de la innovació i la indústria.
Bibliografia
*FREEMAN, Chris and Luc Soete. 1997.
The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition). The
MIT Press. [Part Two].
*HARTMANN, George C. and Mark B. Myers. 2001.
“Technical Risk, Product Specifications and Market
Risk” in Branscome, L. M. and P. E. Auerswald (eds.)
Taking Technical Risks: How innovators, executives, and
investors manage high-tech risks. The MIT Press.
ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1982.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press [Ch. 6].
SHAPIRO, Carl and Hal R. Varian. 1999.
Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy.
Harvard Business School Press. [Ch. 7&8].
Tema 8
L’administració de la innovació: Quina R&D i estratègia
d’innovació han de seguir les empreses i com han
d’estar administrades?
Bibliografia
*UTTERBACK, James M. 1996.
Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business
School Press. [Chs. 1 – 4].
*BOWEN, Kent H., Kim B. Clark, Charles A. Holloway and Steven
C. Wheelwright (eds.) 1994.
The Perpetual Enterprise Machine. New York: Oxford
University Press.
FINANCIAL TIMES. 2004 (09/17, 09/24, 10/01 & 10/08).
Mastering Innovation.
ROBERTS, Edward B. (ed.) 2002.
Innovation: Driving Product, Process, and Market Change. MIT
Sloan Management Review. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, Wiley.
Tema 9
La perspectiva legal. L’inventor ha d’estar protegit?
Com? [2n. debat].
Bibliografia
*BOLDRIN, Michele and David Levine. 2003.
The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly. Work in
progress.
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/intellectual.htm
.
*ROMER, Paul M. 2002. “When Should We Use Intellectual
Property Rights?”
American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings. 213
– 216.
BESEN, Stanley M. and Leo J. Raskind. 1991. “An
Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual
Property,”
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 1, 3-27.
MAZZOLENI, Roberto and Richard Nelson. 1998. “The
Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to
the Current Debate,”
Research Policy. 27, 273-284.
LERNER, J. 2001. “150 years of patent
protection,” NBER Working Paper N0. 7478, January.
GALLINI, Nancy and Suzanne Scotchmer. 2002.
“Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive
System?” in A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern
(eds)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 2), 51 -77.
Tema 10
La perspectiva dels científics. Les societats han d’invertir
en ciència bàsica? Com?
Bibliografia
*ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1982.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economcs. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press. [Ch. 7].
*JAFFE, Adam B. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic
Research,”
American Economic Review, 79, 5.NELSON, Richard R.
1959. “The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific
Research,”
Journal of Political Economy 67, 3, 297-306.
ROSENBERG, Nathan. 2003. “America’s
Entrepreneurial Universities,” in David M. Hart. Ed.
The Emergency of Entrepreneurship Policy.
Tema 11
La política econòmica i la perspectiva de les polítiques
públiques. Qui es resisteix a la innovació? Com haurien
d’estar dissenyades les polítiques d’R&D?
Bibliografia
*MOKYR, Joel. 2002.
The Gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge
economy. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ. [Ch. 6].
*NELSON, Richard and Paul Romer. 1996. “Science,
Economic Growth, and Public Policy,”
Challenge. 39, 2, 9-21.
HALL and van Reenen. 2000. “How Effective Are Fiscal
Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence,”
Research Policy. April 449-470.
ROMER, Paul M. 2000. “Should the Government Subsidize
Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers?
in A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 1),
221-252.
Tema 12
La perspectiva de la UE (Lisboa & Barcelona): com podem fer
d’Europa (i Catalunya) “
l’economia més competitiva del món, basada en coneixements
dinàmics (…) amb una despesa d’R&D del 3% sobre el
PIB”?
Bibliografia
*EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003.
Raising EU R&D Intensity. Directorate-General for
Research.
*GAVIN Wright. 1998. “Can A nation Learn? American
Technology as a Network Phenomenon,” in N. Lamoreaux, D. Raff
and P. Temin (eds.)
Learning By Doing in Markets, Firms and Countries.
University of Chicago Press.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003.
Towards a European Research Area. Key Figures 2002.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003. Third European Report on
Science & Technology Indicators: Towards a Knowledge-based
Economy.
II. PROF. WALTER GARCIA-FONTES
Tema 1. Anàlisi empírica de la competència en R+D entre empreses
Objectius i metodologia de l'anàlisi econòmica aplicada a les
indústries. Models de competència en R+D. Models de carrera de
patents: teoria i evidència empírica.
Bibliografia
HENDERSON (1993).
LERNER (1997).
GILBERT; NEWBERRY (1982).
Tema 2. Canvi tecnològic a les funcions de producció
Aplicar les tècniques de comptabilitat del creixement. Estimació
dels rendiments de l’R+D utilitzant funcions de producció i
valor de mercat de les empreses.
Bibliografia
HALL; MAIRESSE (1995).
HALL (1998).
Tema 3. La mesura del canvi tecnològic
Entendre les diferents fonts de mesura de l'activitat econòmica:
inversió en R+D, patents, balança tecnològica, productes d'alta
tecnologia, qüestionaris a experts, publicacions i cites. Efectes
del canvi tecnològic sobre els índex de preus al consum. La mesura
del canvi tecnològic amb corbes de costos i d'experiència.
Utilització de patents com a mesura del canvi tecnològic.
Bibliografia
HAUSMANN (1999).
FREEMAN (1975).
HALL; JAFFEE; TRAJTENBERG (2004).
Tema 4. Dimensió, concentració i innovació
Entendre les hipòtesis de Schumpeter. Treballar la idea d'Arrow
dels incentius a innovar en indústries en competència. Introduir
els conceptes d'impuls tecnològic i pressió de la demanda. Conèixer
l'evidència empírica sobre la inversió en R+D: fets empírics
estilitzats, concentració i innovació, grandària i innovació,
cooperació. L'anàlisi de Sutton sobre la relació entre concentració
i R+D.
Bibliografia
JORDE; TEECE (1990).
COHEN; LEVIN (1989).
Tema 5. Estàndars i externalitats en xarxa
Entendre la importància dels estàndards per al canvi tecnològic.
Treballar amb casos d'externalitats en xarxa. Analitzar la formació
de coalicions d'usuaris per a la fixació d'estàndards. Tests
empírics sobre l'existència d'externalitats en xarxa.
Bibliografia
KATZ; SHAPIRO (1994).
LIEBOWITZ; MARGOLIS (1994).
GANDAL (1995).
Referències Part I (prof. Ramon Marimon)
ACEMOGLU, Daron. 2003. “Factor Prices and TeCapnical Capange:
From Induced Innovations to Recent Debates,” in P. Aghion et
al. (eds
.) Knowledge, Information and Expectations in Modern
Macroeconomics: In Honor of Edmund Phelps, Princeton University
Press. Princeton, NJ.
ARTHUR, Brian W. 1994. “Positive Feedback in the
Economy,” in B.W. Arthur ed.
Increasing Returns and Pathe Dependence in the Economy. Ann
Arbor, MI: University of MiCapigan Press.
ARROW, Kenneth J. 1962. “Economic Welfare and the
Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in R.R. Nelson ed.
The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and
Social Facotrs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BESEN, Stanley M. and Leo J. RASKIND. 1991. “An
Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual
Property,”
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 1, 3-27.
BOLDRIN, MiCapele and David LEVINE. 2003.
The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly. Treball en
progrés.
http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/general/intellectual/intellectual.htm
BOLDRIN, MiCapele and David LEVINE. 2003.
“Competition and Innovation.” Mimeo. UCLA.
BOTTAZI, L. and M.D. RIN. 2002. “Venture capital in
Europe and the financing of innovative companies,” Economic
Policy, April, 231-269.
BOWEN, Kent H., Kim B. CLARK, Caparles A. HOLLOWAY and Steven
C. WHEELWRIGHT (eds.) 1994.
The Perpetual Enterprise MaCapine. New York: Oxford
University Press.
BRANFORD DeLong, J. 2002. “Do We Have a
‘New’ Macroeconomy?” in A.B. Jaffe, J.
Lerner and S. Stern (eds)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 2), 163
–184.
BRESNAHAN, Timothy F. and Franco MALERBA. 2002. “The
Value of Competitive Innovation and U.S: Policy towards the
Computer Industry” in Capong-En Bai and Capi-Wa Yuen (eds.)
Technology and the New Economy. The MIT Press.
COHEN, Daniel, Pietro GARIBALDI and Stefano SCARPETTA. 2004.
The ICT Revolution: Productivity Differences and the Digital
Divide. Oxford University Press.
DAVERI, Francesco. 2002. “The New Economy in Europe,
1992–2001”
Oxford Review of Economic Policy ,18: 345-362.
DAVID, Paul A. 1986. “Understanding the Economics of
QWERTY: The Necessity of History,” in W.N. Parker ed.
Economic History and the Modern Economist. Oxford:
Blackwell.
DIAMOND, Jared. 1998.
Guns, Germs and Steel. New York: Vintage, Random House.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2000.
Towards a European ResearCap Area. Communication from the
Commission to the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and
the Committee of the Regions.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2002.
Corporation Ttax and Innovation. Innovation Papers No. 19.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003.
Towards a European ResearCap Area. Key Figures 2002.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003. Third European Report on Science
& Technology Indicators: Towards a Knowledge-based Economy.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003.
Raising EU R&D Intensity. Directorate-General for
ResearCap.
EUROSTAT. 2001.
Science and Technology in Europe. Statistical Pocketbook, Data
1990 – 2000.
EUROSTAT. 2002.
ResearCap and Development: Annual Statistics,, Data 1990 –
2000.
FLORIDA, RiCapard. 2003. “Entrepreneurship, Creativity
and Regional Economic Growth” in David M. Hart. Ed.
The Emergency of Entrepreneurship Policy.
FAGERBERG, Jan. 1994. “Technology and
International Differences in Growth Rates”
Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1147 – 1175.
FAGERBERG, Jan. 2002.
Technology, Growth and Competitiveness. Selected Essays.
Edward Elgar, Capeltenham.
FREEEMAN, Capris and Luc SOETE. 1997.
The Economics of Industrial Innovation (Third Edition). The
MIT Press.
FINANCIAL TIMES. 2004 (09/17, 09/24, 10/01 & 10/08).
Mastering Innovation.
GALLINI, Nancy and Suzanne SCOTCAPMER. 2002.
“Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive
System?” in A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern
(eds)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 2), 51 -77.
GAVIN Wright. 1998. “Can A nation Learn? American
Technology as a Network Phenomenon,” in N. Lamoreaux, D. Raff
and P. Temin (eds.)
Learning By Doing in Markets, Firms and Countries.
University of Capicago Press.
GORDON, Robert. 2000. “Does the ‘New
Economy’ Measure up to Great innovations of the Past?”
Journal of Economic Perspectives. 14, 4, 49-74.
GREENWOOD , Jeremy. 1997.
The Third Industrial Revolution: Technology, Productivity and
Income Inequality, AEI Studies on Understanding
Inequality, Washington,DC. The AEI Press. També publicat a
Economic Review, 1999, Federal Reserve Bank
of Cleveland.
GREENWOOD , Jeremy, MiCapael GORT and Peter RUPERT. 1999.
"How MuCap of Economic Growth is Fueled by Investment-Specific
TeCapnological Progress?"
Economic Commentary.
HALL and VAN REENEN. 2000. “How Effective Are Fiscal
Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence,”
ResearCap Policy. April 449-470.
HART, David M. ed. 2003.
The Emergency of Entrepreneurship Policy. Cambridge
University Press.
HAYEK, F.A. 1978. “Competition as a Discovery
Process,” Cap. 12 in F. A. Hayek,
New Studies in Philosophy and the History of Ideas.London:
Ruetledge.
JAFFE, Adam B. 1986. “TeCapnological Opportunity
and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents,
Profits and Market Value,”
American Economic Review, 76, 5, 984-1001.
JAFFE, Adam B. 1989. “Real Effects of Academic
ResearCap,”
American Economic Review, 79, 5.
JOVANOVIC, Boyan and Peter L ROUSSEAU. 2002. “Stock
Markets in the New Economy” in Capong-En Bai and Capi-Wa Yuen
(eds.)
Technology and the New Economy. The MIT Press.
KREPS, David M. 2004.
Microeconomics for Managers. Norton & Co., New York.
LANDES, David S. 1969.
The Unbound Prometheus: TeCapnological Capange, 1750 to the
Present. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LANDES, David S. 1998. “East is East and West is
West” in M. Berg and K. Bruland (eds.)
TeCapnological Revolutions in Europe. Edward Elgar,
Capeltenham, UK.
LERNER, J. 2001. “150 years of patent
protection,” NBER Working Paper N0. 7478, January.
LIPSEY, RiCapard G., Cliff BEKAR and Kenneth CARLAW. 1998.
“The Consequences of Capanges in GPTs” in Helpman,
Elhanan (ed.)
General Purpose TeCapnologies and Economic Growth. The MIT
Press.
MADDISON, A. 1991.
Monitoring the World Economy: 1820 – 1992. Paris,
OECD.
MAZZOLENI, Roberto and RiCapard NELSON. 1998. “The
Benefits and Costs of Strong Patent Protection: A Contribution to
the Current Debate,”
ResearCap Policy. 27, 273-284.
MOKYR, Joel. 1990.
The Lever of RiCapes: TeCapnological Creativity and Economic
Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.
MOKYR, Joel. 1990.
Twenty-Five Centuries of TeCapnological Capange:
An Historical Survey. Harwood Academic Publishers.
MOKYR, Joel. 2000. “Innovation and Its Enemies: The
Economic and Political Roots of TeCapnological Inertia,” in
M. Olson and S. Kähkönen (eds.)
A Not so Dismal Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.,
61-91.
MOKYR, Joel. 2002.
The Gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge
economy. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD. 2002.
Science and Engineering Indicators – 2002. Arlington,
VA: National Science Foundation.
NELSON, RiCapard R. 1959. “The Simple Economics of
Basic Scientific ResearCap,”
Journal of Political Economy 67, 3, 297-306.
NELSON, RiCapard and Paul ROMER. 1996. “Science,
Economic Growth, and Public Policy,”
Capallenge. 39, 2, 9-21.
OECD. 2002.
Main Science and Technology Indicators. 2001 – 2002.
OECD. 2001.
Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2001.
POHJOLA, Matti. 2002. “The New Economy in Growth and
Development” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18: 380-396.
PARENTE, Stephen L. And Edward C. PRESCOTT. 2002.
Barriers to RiCapes. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
PORTER, MiCapael E. 2001. “Strategy and the
Internet,”
Harvard Business Review. 89, 3, 62-78.
ROMER, Paul M. 2000. “Should the Government Subsidize
Supply or Demand in the Market for Scientists and Engineers?
in A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds)
Innovation Policy and the Economy (Volume 1), 221-252.
ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1982.
Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press.
ROSENBERG, Nathan.. 1990. “Why Do Firms Do Basic
ResearCap (with Their Own Money),”
ResearCap Policy. 20, 165-174.
ROSENBERG, Nathan. 1994.
Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History.
Cambridge University Press.
ROSENBERG, Nathan. 2003. “America’s
Entrepreneurial Universities,” in David M. Hart. Ed.
The Emergency of Entrepreneurship Policy.
ROSENBERG, Nathan and L. E. BIRDZELL. 1986.
How the West Grew RiCap: The Economic Transformation of the
Industrial World. New York, Basic Books.
RUTTAN, Vernon W. 2001
Technology, Growth and Development. Oxford University Press.
SAH, R. and Joseph STIGLITZ. 1986. “The ArCapitecture
of Economic Systems: HierarCapies and PolyarCapies”,
American Economic Review 76(4), 716 –727.
SHAPIRO, Carl and Hal R. VARIAN. 1999.
Information Rules. A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy.
Harvard Business SCapool Press.
SHERER, F.M. 1999.
New Perspectives on Economic Growth and TeCapnological
Innovation. Brookings.
STONEMAN, Paul. 1987.
The Economic Analysis of Technology Policy. Oxford
University Press.
TEMPLE, Jonathan. 2002. “The Assessment: The New
Economy,”
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18: 241-264.
THIRTLE, Colin G. and Vernon W. RUTTAN. 1987.
The Role of Demand and Supply in the Generation and Diffusion of
TeCapnological Capange. Harwood Academic.
UTTERBACK, James M. 1996.
Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business
SCapool Press.
WILLIAMSON. 1991. “Productivity and American
Leadership: A review Article,”
Journal of Economic Literature. MarCap 51-68.
Referències Part II (prof. Walter García-Fontes)
COHEN, Wesley M., and Richard C. LEVIN (1989). ``Empirical Studies
of Innovation and Market Structure,'' in Schmalensee, Richard and
Willig, Robert D. (eds.),
Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2. Amsterdam;
Oxford and Tokyo: North-Holland, pp. 1059-1107.
FREEMAN, Christopher (1975),
La teoría económica de la innovación industrial, Apéndice,
pp. 311-387.
GANDAL, Neil (1995). "Competing Compatibility Standards and
Network Externalities in the PC Software Market," Review of
Economics and Statistics LXVII (4)}, 599-608.GILBERT, Richard, and
David NEWBERRY (1982). “Preemptive Patenting and the
Persistence of Monopoly,"
American Economic Review 62, 514-526.
HALL, Bronwyn H. and Jacques MAIRESSE (1995).``Exploring
the Relationship Between R \& D and Productivity in French
Manufacturing Firms,''
Journal of Econometrics, 65: 263-293.
HALL, Bronwyn H (2000). ``Innovation and Market Value.''
en Barrell, Ray, Geoffrey Mason, i Mary O’Mahoney
(eds.),
Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HALL, Bronwyn, JAFFEE, Adam, and TRAJTENBERG, Manuel (2000),
``Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look.''Department of
Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC
Berkeley, Department of Economics, Working Paper Series: 1036.
HAUSMAN, Jerry A. (1999). ``Cellular Telephones, New
Products, and the CPI'',
Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 17, pp.
188-194.
HENDERSON, Rebecca (1993). "Underinvestment and Incompetence
as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence form the
Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry," Rand Journal
of Economics 24 (2: 248-270.
JORDE, Thomas M. i David J. TEECE (1990).``Innovació i
Cooperació: Implicacions per a la Competència i la Política
Anti-Monopolis,''
Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volum 4, N. 3, pp. 75-96.
KATZ, Michael L. i Carl SHAPIRO (1994).``Systems Competition
and Network Effects'', Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp.
93-116.
LERNER, Josh (1997). "An Empirical Exploration of a
Technology Race,"
Rand Journal of Economics 28, 2: 228-247.
LIEBOWITZ, S.J. i Stephen E. MARGOLIS (1994).``Network
Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy'', Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 8, pp. 133-150.